Fo
FortunaMCP – LLMs suck at randomness. I fixed it
FortunaMCP – LLMs suck at randomness. I fixed it
Share cardActual performance
7points
3comments
Made the leaderboard
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →87%87% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
60%60% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
43%43% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
37%37% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
35%35% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
34%34% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
18%18% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Correct prediction on native model
Similar products
GP
GPTCache – Redis for LLMs69%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
GPTCache – Redis for LLMs
pr
prompttest – pytest for LLMs34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
prompttest – pytest for LLMs
FixMyDev34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
Your dev nightmare fixed
I
I fixed what LinkedIn couldn't, no more unqualified applicants42%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
I fixed what LinkedIn couldn't, no more unqualified applicants
Co
Copilot sucks, so I fixed it45%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
Copilot sucks, so I fixed it
IP
IPOs.fyi – Missing Out on IPOs Was Frustrating, So I Fixed It53%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
IPOs.fyi – Missing Out on IPOs Was Frustrating, So I Fixed It
Mi
Mindmapping wasn't working for me, so I fixed it65%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
Mindmapping wasn't working for me, so I fixed it
I
I just fixed .env once and for all – better-env48%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
I just fixed .env once and for all – better-env
I
I fixed journaling for myself49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
I fixed journaling for myself
I
I forged the Lithuanian Vaccine Certificate and got it fixed56%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.
I forged the Lithuanian Vaccine Certificate and got it fixed