Ch

Charter – Operate production-safe agents that run on your own infra

Hacker News

Charter – Operate production-safe agents that run on your own infra

Even though everyone is talking about AI agents doing everything for them at work, many companies still aren't using autonomous agents to automate real operational work internally. Usually it's because of the complexity of bootstrapping an agent from scratch that’s production-safe (won’t spend all your company’s budget, burn through compute costs because it runs too often, or call a tool that breaks a customer). Even with today's agent-building frameworks, running agents reliably in production often means stitching together LangChain, Temporal, observability tools, approval systems, and custom guardrail logic. And that’s just for running an agent safely: there also has to be a management system so someone can observe and operate all their agents (upgrade it, roll it back, stop it). We wanted to build the end-to-end internal agent infrastructure that every company has to build today to use production-safe agents internally as an open-source platform. The important thing is that getting an agent running safely is quick and simple: someone can first define their agent tying it to a version, and their lifecycle and runtime policies in YAML. Next they register their agents on workers in YAML and run those workers wherever they want. This means that if one AKS cluster has permissions for the tools needed for agents X and Y and another has permissions for agents A and B, they would each register those agents on their respective clusters. Finally they can use the CLI to apply and run the agent, and then manage it with approvals, responding to questions its asking, upgrade it/roll it back/pause it (via either CLI or a UI/portal running on localhost that are communicating with the control plane). Some of the agent lifecycle management can be automated by the system: metric-based lifecycle policies make it so a user can say “if this new agent version I’m trying out (with a different prompt) fails 10 times, roll it back to the old version” or “if the new agent version is spending over a certain amount in the last 5 runs block it from being run anymore till I debug and resume it”. This is useful for teams that want to run many agents without needing someone on standby to intervene if something goes wrong on any one of them. The control plane is self-hostable or can be run via a managed cloud offering, and the self-hostable option combined with someone doing local inference is actually a completely air-gapped system. Give it a try: https://github.com/boundflow/charter and let us know what you think.

Share card

Actual performance

4points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: agents, agent, user · Missing: mac, macos, cursor
97%97% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
83%83% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
58%58% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
TrustMRRFits verified-revenue profile · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
52%52% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Strong signals: platform, host · Missing: plus, intuitive, reviews
25%25% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
21%21% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Incorrect prediction on native model

Similar products

Ru
RunOS – Run Your Own Cloud on Your Own Infra65%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

RunOS – Run Your Own Cloud on Your Own Infra

Hacker News4
Fo
Forte – Cloud infra to get startups to production faster64%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Forte – Cloud infra to get startups to production faster

Hacker News7
Ji
Jido – Run 10k agents at 25KB each (Elixir)74%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Jido – Run 10k agents at 25KB each (Elixir)

Hacker News13
Ag
AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AgentMail – Email infra for AI agents

Hacker News121
As
AsyncQ dotnet thread safe async queues47%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AsyncQ dotnet thread safe async queues

Hacker News3
Sa
Safe CarTech – A rear collision prevention system30%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Safe CarTech – A rear collision prevention system

Hacker News5
Xr
Xr0 – Vanilla C Made Safe with Annotations65%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Xr0 – Vanilla C Made Safe with Annotations

Hacker News17
We
We are building a production agent to turn your code into cloud infra58%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

We are building a production agent to turn your code into cloud infra

Hacker News4
St
StackImpact – Java Production Profiler57%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

StackImpact – Java Production Profiler

Hacker News1
PO
POC AES implementation in C (not for production)25%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

POC AES implementation in C (not for production)

Hacker News1