Re

Remarc – better contextual feedback for AI agents

Hacker News

Remarc – better contextual feedback for AI agents

Like any side project, Remarc started with my own problem: there was no good way to give AI coding agents contextual feedback on their own output. There are plenty of tools for collaborating with humans, but surprisingly few for collaborating with AI. Chat was not cutting it for the feedback I wanted to give: This thing in the implementation plan? Change it to that. What did you mean here? See this button? Here is a screenshot. I circled it because it is missing a hover state. This sentence in the third paragraph? Rephrase it. If you are an opinionated builder, this gets clunky quickly. You either dictate paragraphs of messy feedback or resolve every detail one by one. AI is good at parsing mess, but garbage in, garbage out still applies. I could get products to 90% quickly. The last 10% of feedback and polish was the bottleneck. So I built Remarc. Remarc lets you select text in any Mac app, capture and annotate a screenshot, or comment on a web element. Each comment keeps its original context, status, and session. A connected agent can read the session, work through it, update statuses, and leave resolution summaries over MCP. Think of it like leaving comments on a google doc vs sending a long rambling feedback note via Slack - the more granular you get with your feedback, the more it benefits from structure & better context. Remarc is free and open source, with no account, subscription, or telemetry. https://remarc.app/ https://github.com/metedata/Remarc

Share card

Actual performance

1points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: mac, agents, agent · Missing: macos, cursor, claude
96%96% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: started, para · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
59%59% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: google, way, para · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
47%47% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: open source, ide, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
40%40% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Strong signals: builder · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
33%33% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Strong signals: subscription · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
24%24% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: chat · Missing: web3, crypto, cryptocurrency
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Freddy Feedback
Freddy Feedback40%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Turn feedback into better products.

Indie Hackers9analytics
fdbck
fdbck63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

The feedback API for developers and AI agents.

Indie Hackers1$18/moai
AI
AI Agents Benchmarking and Competition41%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AI Agents Benchmarking and Competition

Hacker News2
OA
OAuth for AI Agents37%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

OAuth for AI Agents

Hacker News8
47
47jobs – A Fiverr/Upwork for AI Agents43%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

47jobs – A Fiverr/Upwork for AI Agents

Hacker News20
SA
SAIA – SCUMM for AI Agents25%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

SAIA – SCUMM for AI Agents

Hacker News3
Ro
RoverBook – PostHog for AI Agents25%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

RoverBook – PostHog for AI Agents

Hacker News4
Te
Teleport-env – <500ms stateful rollbacks for AI agents via CRIU15%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Teleport-env – <500ms stateful rollbacks for AI agents via CRIU

Hacker News9
Ne
Neoswarm – Neovim for controlling AI agents36%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Neoswarm – Neovim for controlling AI agents

Hacker News4
AI
AI Agents for Osint/Sigint46%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AI Agents for Osint/Sigint

Hacker News13