Kn

Knowerage – code coverage for LLM analysis

Hacker News

Knowerage – code coverage for LLM analysis

Hello HN! Like most of developers, I have worked on migrating a large legacy codebase with no up-to-date documentation or unit tests, and found AI agents, like Claude LLM, to be very helpful for finding and describing specific functionality. However, returning to the same code with agents feels wasteful in terms of token usage. Also, after finishing migrating some part of the software, I wanted to know which parts of the code still required analysis and migration. This would require to visit and review both the code and documentation to find the gaps. After not finding a solution on the internet that satisfied my needs, I created a structure that could link markdown analysis files to the source code. To enforce agent to use this structure to help track documentation coverage, I decided to create a small MCP server. With it the agent is able to tell me how much of the code is left to be analysed in percentage, as well as identify parts of code and functionality that require analysis. The ultimate goal is to identify requirements that have not been migrated yet, assuming the documented functionality has been. The server is entirely local, it does not access the internet, besides for the MCP client to download and run the server package using npx. Important disclaimer! The code was generated using orchestrated Claude Opus-4.5 agents from a set of requirements. The requirement and task markdown files can be found in the 'agent_tasks' folder of the repository.

Share card

Actual performance

1points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: agents, agent, claude · Missing: mac, macos, cursor
93%93% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: created · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
75%75% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRFits verified-revenue profile · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
50%50% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: ide, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
27%27% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
22%22% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
14%14% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Bi
Bisect_ppx – Modernized code coverage for OCaml43%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Bisect_ppx – Modernized code coverage for OCaml

Hacker News7
Bl
Bluecov – Code Coverage40%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Bluecov – Code Coverage

Hacker News3
Ba
Bashcov – a code coverage tool for Bash46%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Bashcov – a code coverage tool for Bash

Hacker News2
Ob
Objcov – Code Coverage for Objects37%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Objcov – Code Coverage for Objects

Hacker News2
Co
Code coverage tree heatmaps for Go46%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Code coverage tree heatmaps for Go

Hacker News1
Li
Live Coverage of Olympic Torch as it travels across Russia39%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Live Coverage of Olympic Torch as it travels across Russia

Hacker News1
Go
Go statistics library with 100% code coverage and no dependencies43%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Go statistics library with 100% code coverage and no dependencies

Hacker News6
Su
Subnet CIDR Coverage Calculator37%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Subnet CIDR Coverage Calculator

Hacker News1
Co
CoverageTrends – Graph code coverage over time (SimpleCov + CircleCI)46%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

CoverageTrends – Graph code coverage over time (SimpleCov + CircleCI)

Hacker News1
Co
Coverage-targeted testing with Erlang's Quickcheck58%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Coverage-targeted testing with Erlang's Quickcheck

Hacker News1