Multi-agent autoresearch for ANE inference beats Apple's CoreML by 6×
Multi-agent autoresearch for ANE inference beats Apple's CoreML by 6×
We ran an experiment over the weekend to explore whether multiple autonomous agents could collaboratively optimize inference on Apple’s Neural Engine (ANE). Each agent ran locally on a different Mac (M1–M4), repeatedly modifying how a DistilBERT model is executed on the ANE, benchmarking latency, and sharing results and insights with other agents in real time. Instead of exploring independently, agents could: - see what others had tried - reuse working strategies - avoid known failure modes Across all tested chips, the agents ended up outperforming Apple’s CoreML baseline, with up to 6.31× lower median inference latency on the same hardware. An interesting pattern we observed: an agent stuck at ~2.1ms latency on M4 was able to break through after incorporating strategies discovered by agents on different chips (M2, M4 Max), eventually reaching ~1.5ms and surpassing CoreML. Full write-up: https://x.com/christinetyip/status/2039040161439224157 Detailed results: https://ensue-network.ai/lab/ane?view=strategies https://ensue-network.ai/lab/ane Curious what other optimization problems this kind of setup could be applied to, especially in systems, compilers, or ML infra. Would be interested in exploring similar experiments.
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Incorrect prediction on native model
Similar products
Multi-agent LLM editor with local inference via WebSockets
The torque behind multi-agent intelligence.
AITalksToAI – A multi-agent LLM chatroom
Multi-Agent Framework for Ruby
Async multi-agent coordination across physical environments
Multi-Agent Medical AI For Physicians
Veritas AI – Multi-Agent Deliberation for Truth
Simulations of Multi-Agent Dialogues
World’s First Multi-Agent Operating System
Ovadare – resolving AI agent conflicts in multi-agent platforms