I

I solo-validated Fed learning at 10M nodes with 50% Byzantine tolerance

Hacker News

I solo-validated Fed learning at 10M nodes with 50% Byzantine tolerance

I just finished testing a federated learning system at 10 million nodes. It maintains 82% accuracy even when 5 million nodes are malicious. Here's what happened ↓ --- *The Test (Feb 24, 2026)* 10,000,000 nodes 4,000,000 - 5,000,000 malicious (Byzantine) nodes 59 minutes 41 seconds total runtime 100% success rate Results: • 40% Byzantine (4M bad): 83.3% accuracy • 50% Byzantine (5M bad): 82.2% accuracy --- *Why this matters* Google's federated learning papers max out at ~10K nodes in production. Academic Byzantine fault tolerance systems (HoneyBadgerBFT, etc.) are tested at 100-1K nodes. I just validated 10M nodes with 50% malicious participation—solo, in under an hour. --- *Scaling proven across 5 orders of magnitude* 100 nodes → 10M nodes O(n log n) holds perfectly Streaming aggregation prevents memory death Per-round time: 127-154 seconds at 10M scale --- *The stack* - Rust/Go core (MOHAWK protocol) - Python SDK - WebAssembly edge runtime - zk-SNARK verification (<1ms) - Hardware root of trust (TPM 2.0) - Hierarchical batching for extreme scale --- *Solo dev context* Built this alone. 5 hours of continuous testing today. 135KB documentation. 100% test pass rate. No $10M venture funding. No PhD team. No Google infrastructure. Just code that works at any scale. --- *What this enables* - Global sensor networks (climate, defense, agriculture) - Cross-hospital AI without patient data sharing - Multi-national intelligence collaboration - Autonomous vehicle fleets training together - Any scenario where you can't trust 50% of participants --- Release: https://github.com/rwilliamspbg-ops/Sovereign_Map_Federated_... Repo: https://github.com/rwilliamspbg-ops/Sovereign_Map_Federated_... Looking for: defense pilots, enterprise users, academic collaboration, contributors. Happy to answer questions.

Share card

Actual performance

2points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
76%76% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: google, user, context · Missing: mac, agents, macos
51%51% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: 000, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
49%49% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: google, users · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
48%48% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Strong signals: users · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
27%27% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Strong signals: training · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
26%26% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Ti
TimeForZen, my first "learning to code" solo project44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

TimeForZen, my first "learning to code" solo project

Hacker News19
Sp
SpaceX Starship Lander, 50% chance of explode60%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

SpaceX Starship Lander, 50% chance of explode

Hacker News1
ffaroh.
ffaroh.35%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Solo Traveler App

Indie Hackers2apis
Saidar
Saidar28%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Your AI Secretary for 50+ Apps

Indie Hackerscommitment-side-project
Zi
Zigpoll (contextual microsurveys) – My solo SaaS40%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Zigpoll (contextual microsurveys) – My solo SaaS

Hacker News1
Qu
Quantifying Learning54%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Quantifying Learning

Hacker News2
I’
I’m still learning54%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

I’m still learning

Hacker News4
Le
Learning GraphQL75%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Learning GraphQL

Hacker News4
Fe
Federated Learning54%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Federated Learning

Hacker News2
Le
Learning SICP with Understudy54%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Learning SICP with Understudy

Hacker News109