I analyzed 297k HN posts – your fate is sealed in 2 hours
I analyzed 297k HN posts – your fate is sealed in 2 hours
I built an archiver that tracked every HN item for 27 days (Dec 3-30, 2025) and captured 72k temporal snapshots to see how posts gain and lose attention. Key findings: - Early velocity (points/hour in first 2 hours) predicts final score with ρ=0.82. A simple classifier achieves 98.4% precision for viral prediction. - No Matthew effect: high-scoring posts don't get more upvotes per hour than low-scoring ones (ρ=-0.04). HN's gravity penalty actually works. - Yet extreme inequality persists: Gini=0.89, meaning bottom 80% of posts get <10% of total upvotes. Inequality without cumulative advantage. - Attention decays as a power law (α=0.52), slower than exponential; quality content has longer tails. Paper (open access): https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5910263 Code + data: github.com/philippdubach/hn-archiver
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Correct prediction on native model
Similar products
6.5 hours of Ember Screencasts
Top HN Posts of 2021
HN Posts on the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict
Related Posts in Eleventy
Top HN Posts July 2022
Top HN Posts August 2022
Whoishiring Posts with Listed Compensation
Pol/ite – /pol/ but posts are all polite
WorkLogger – Simple Hours Logger
Visit your procrastinated website only in visit hours