In

IntentusNet – Deterministic Execution and Replay for AI Agent Systems

Hacker News

IntentusNet – Deterministic Execution and Replay for AI Agent Systems

Hi HN, I’ve been working on an open-source project called IntentusNet. It focuses on a narrow but persistent problem in AI systems: AI executions are observable, but not reproducible. When a production issue happens: the model may already be upgraded fallback logic may have changed retries may be implicit routing decisions are no longer recoverable Logs tell you something happened, but they don’t let you replay the execution itself. What IntentusNet does IntentusNet is not a planner, prompt framework, or model wrapper. It’s an execution runtime that enforces deterministic semantics around models: explicit intent routing deterministic fallback behavior ordered agent execution transport-agnostic agents (local, HTTP, ZeroMQ, WebSocket, MCP-style) In the latest release, I added execution recording and deterministic replay. Each intent execution can be: recorded as an immutable artifact replayed later without re-running models explained even after models or agents change The core invariant is simple: The model may change. The execution must not. Why I built this Most AI systems implicitly trust the model to drive control flow. That makes failures hard to reason about and almost impossible to reproduce. IntentusNet takes the opposite approach: models are treated as unreliable but useful routing and fallback are explicit and deterministic executions are facts, not logs This is closer to how distributed systems treat requests than how most LLM stacks work today. Demo (what it actually proves) There’s a small demo that shows: A live execution with “model v1” The same execution with “model v2” (different output) A deterministic replay of the original execution, even after the model changes Routing and execution order stay the same. Only the model behavior changes. No debugger UI, no dashboards — just execution semantics. What this is not Not a replacement for MCP Not a prompt-engineering framework Not a monitoring system Not trying to be “smart” It’s infrastructure for making AI systems operable. Repo GitHub: https://github.com/Balchandar/intentusnet I’m especially interested in feedback from people who’ve had to debug LLM-related production incidents or explain AI behavior after the fact. Happy to answer questions or criticism.

Share card

Actual performance

1points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: agents, agent, model · Missing: mac, macos, cursor
98%98% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
57%57% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
42%42% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
28%28% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: ide, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
26%26% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Strong signals: arr · Missing: mrr, revenue, profit
17%17% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: smart · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Or
Orchid – Local-first record and replay for AI agent debugging48%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Orchid – Local-first record and replay for AI agent debugging

Hacker News4
TraceFlowLens
TraceFlowLens32%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Record, replay, and compare AI agent executions

Indie Hackerscommitment-side-project
St
Stopping AI agent swarms from hacking our systems44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Stopping AI agent swarms from hacking our systems

Hacker News1
AgentAutopsy
AgentAutopsy13%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Record, replay, and debug AI agent failures.

Indie Hackerscommitment-full-time
De
DevBox – An execution contract to end AI agent instruction fatigue26%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

DevBox – An execution contract to end AI agent instruction fatigue

Hacker News3
Re
Recommender Systems in Keras48%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Recommender Systems in Keras

Hacker News14
Fe
Fern – L-systems in Go48%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Fern – L-systems in Go

Hacker News3
PV
PVBenchmark – UserBenchmark for PV Systems34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

PVBenchmark – UserBenchmark for PV Systems

Hacker News1
PV
PVBenchmark – UserBenchmark for PV Systems34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

PVBenchmark – UserBenchmark for PV Systems

Hacker News1
Tr
Troubleshoot distributed systems51%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Troubleshoot distributed systems

Hacker News6