Roundtable MCP, Orchestrate Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini and Codex
Roundtable MCP, Orchestrate Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini and Codex
Hey HN, Last week, I spent 40 minutes debugging a production issue that should have taken 5. Not because the bug was complex, but because I kept switching between Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini - copying context, losing thread, starting over. The workflow was painful: 1. Claude Code couldn't reproduce a React rendering bug 2. Copy-pasted 200 lines to Cursor - different answer, still wrong 3. Tried Codex - needed to re-explain the database schema 4. Finally Gemini spotted it, but I'd lost the original error logs This context-switching tax happens weekly. So I built Roundtable AI MCP Server. What makes it different: Unlike existing multi-agent tools that require custom APIs or complex setup, Roundtable works with your existing AI CLI tools through the Model Context Protocol. Zero configuration - it auto-discovers what's installed and just works. Architecture: Your IDE → MCP Server → Multiple AI CLIs (parallel execution) It runs CLI Coding Agents in headless mode and shares the results with the LLM of choice. Real examples I use daily: Example 1 - Parallel Code Review: Claude Code > Run Gemini, Codex, Cursor and Claude Code Subagent in parallel and task them to review my landing page at '@frontend/src/app/roundtable/page.tsx' → Gemini: React performance, component architecture, UX patterns → Codex: Code quality, TypeScript usage, best practices → Cursor: Accessibility, SEO optimization, modern web standards → Claude: Business logic, user flow, conversion optimization Save their review in {subagent_name}_review.md then aggregate their feedback Example 2 - Sequential Task Delegation: First: Assign Gemini Subagent to summarize the logic of '@server.py' Then: Send summary to Codex Subagent to implement Feature X from 'feature_x_spec.md' Finally: I run the code and provide feedback to Codex until all tests in 'test_cases.py' pass (Tests hidden from Codex to avoid overfitting) Example 3 - Specialized Debugging: Assign Cursor with GPT-5 and Cursor with Claude-4-thinking to debug issues in 'server.py' Here's the production log: [memory leak stacktrace] Create comprehensive fix plan with root cause analysis All run in parallel with shared project context. Takes 2-5 minutes vs 20+ minutes of manual copy-paste coordination. Try it: pip install roundtable-ai roundtable-ai --check # Shows which AI tools you have I'd love feedback on: 1. Which AI combinations work best for your debugging workflows? 2. Any IDE integration pain points? 3. Team adoption blockers I should address? GitHub: [https://github.com/askbudi/roundtable](https://github.com/askbudi/roundtable) Website: [https://askbudi.ai/roundtable](https://askbudi.ai/roundtable)
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Correct prediction on native model
Similar products
One workspace for Claude Code, Gemini, Codex, and 8 more
Branchlet – Git Worktree TUI for Claude Code/Cursor/Codex etc.
Claude Code in Cursor
Agent Launch – One CLI for Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini, OpenCode
iTerm2 Plugin for Codex/Claude Code
DevSquad – Claude Code Plugin That Works with to Gemini CLI and Codex
Gemini Plugin for Claude Code
Ever Wanted to Call Codex from Claude Code? My Harness Orchestrator
Promode for Claude Code
DeepContext MCP – Large Codebase Search for Codex and Claude Code