Ti

Timep – A next-gen profiler and flamegraph-generator for bash code

Hacker News

Timep – A next-gen profiler and flamegraph-generator for bash code

Note: this is an update to [this]( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44568529 ) "Show HN" post. timep is a state-of-the-art [debug-]trap-based bash profiler that is efficient and extremely accurate. Unlike other profilers, timep records: 1. per-command wall-clock time 2. per-command CPU time, and 3. the hierarchy of parent function calls /subshells for each command the wall-clock + CPU time combination allows you to determine if a particular command is CPU-bound or IO-bound, and the hierarchical logging gives you a map of how the code actually executed. The standout feature of timep is that it will take these records and automatically generate a bash-native flamegraph (that shows bash commands, not syscalls). ------------------------------------------------ USAGE timep is extremely easy to use - just source the `timep.bash` file from the repo and add "timep" in front of whatever you want to profile. for example: . /path/to/timep.bash timep ./some_script echo "stdin" | timep some_function ZERO changes need to be made to the code being profiled! ------------------------------------------------ EXAMPLES [test code that will be profiled]( https://github.com/jkool702/timep/blob/main/TESTS/timep.test... ) [output profile for that test code]( https://github.com/jkool702/timep/blob/main/TESTS/OUTPUT/out... ) [flamegraph for that test code]( https://github.com/jkool702/timep/blob/main/TESTS/OUTPUT/fla... ) [flamegraph from a "real world" test of "forkrun", a parallelization engine written in bash]( https://github.com/jkool702/timep/blob/main/TESTS/FORKRUN/fl... ) In the "forkrun test", 13 different checksums were computed for ~670k small files on a ramdisk using 28 parallel workers. this was repeated twice. In total, this test ran around 67,000 individual bash commands. [This is its `perf stat` (without timep)]( https://github.com/jkool702/timep/blob/main/TESTS/FORKRUN/pe... ). ------------------------------------------------ EFFICIENCY AND ACCURACY The forkrun test (see "examples" section above) was basically as demanding of a workload as one can have in bash. it fully utilized 24.5 cores on a 14c/28t i9-7940x CPU, racking up >840 seconds of CPU time in ~34.5 seconds of wall-clock time. When profiling this group of 67,000 commands with timep: 1. the time it took for the code to run with the debug-trap instrumentation was ~38 seconds, an increase of just slightly over 10%. CPU time had a similiar increase. 2. the time profile was ready at +2 minutes (1 minute + 15 seconds after the profiling run finished) 3. the flamegraphs were ready at +5 minutes (4 minute + 15 seconds after the profiling run finished) Note that timep records both "start" and "stop" timestamps for every command, and the debug trap instrumentation runs between one commands "stop" timestamp and the next commands "start" timestamp, meaning the error in the profiles timings is far less than the 10% overhead. Comparing the total (sys+user) CPU time that perf stat gave (without using timep) and the CPU time timep gives (from summing together the CPU time of all 67,000-ish commands), the difference is virtually always less than 0.5%, and often less than 0.2%. Ive seen as low as 0.04%, which is 1/3 of a second on a run that took ~850 seconds of CPU time. ------------------------------------------------ MAJOR CHANGES SINCE THE LAST "SHOW HN" POST 1. CPU time is now recorded too (instead of just wall-clock time). This is done via a loadable builtin that calls `getrusage` and (if available) `clock_gettime` to efficiently and accurate determine the CPU time of the process and all its descendants. 2. the .so file required to use the loadable builtin mentioned in #1 is built directly into the script has an embedded compressed base64 sequence. I also developed the bash-native compression scheme that it uses. The .so files for x86_64, aarch64, ppc64le and i686 are all included. Im hoping to add arm7 soon as well. the flamegraph generator perl script is also embedded, making the script 100% fully self-contained. NOTE: these embedded base64 strings include both sha256 and md5 checksums of the resulting .so file that are verified on extraction. 3. the flamegraph generation has been completely overhauled. The flamegraphs now a) are colored based on runtime (hot colors = longer runtime), b) desaturate colors for commands where cpu time << wall-clock time (e.g., blocking reads, sleep, wait, ...), and c) use a runtime-weighted CDF color mapping that ensures, regardless of the distribution of the underlying data, that the resulting flamegraph has a roughly equal amount of each color in the colorspace (where "equal" means "the same number of pixels are showing each color"). timep also combines multiple flamegraphs (that show wallclock time vs cpu time and that us the full vs folded set of traces) by vertically stacking them into a single SVG image, giving "dual stack" and "quad stack" flamegraphs. 4. the post-processing workflow has been basically completely re-written, making it more robust, easier to understand/maintain, and much faster. The "forkrun" test linked above (that ran 67,000 commands) previously took ~20 minutes. With the new version, you can get a profile in 2 minutes or a profile + flamegraph in 5 minutes - a 4x to 10x speedup!

Share card

Actual performance

53points
12comments
Made the leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: para, efficiently · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
93%93% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: user, new, single · Missing: mac, agents, macos
79%79% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: 000, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
61%61% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
AppSumoStrong fit for a featured deal · Strong signals: soon, efficient, calls · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
55%55% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: way, para · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
37%37% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
18%18% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: real world · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Er
Erlang's Gen-Fsm in Go65%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Erlang's Gen-Fsm in Go

Hacker News5
Crowdraising
Crowdraising52%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Next-Gen Crowdsourcing

Indie Hackers1$500/mob2b
Fidl
Fidl52%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

The next-gen ticketing system.

Indie Hackers
Wozi
Wozi40%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Next-gen sweetener:not only sweeten but also enhances flavor

Indie Hackers1b2b
Cr
Cruddiy a no-code Bootstrap CRUD generator58%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Cruddiy a no-code Bootstrap CRUD generator

Hacker News1
Cu
Cue to Go server with code gen51%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Cue to Go server with code gen

Hacker News1
Pr
Protoc-gen-gotf Terraform provider go code generator37%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Protoc-gen-gotf Terraform provider go code generator

Hacker News1
Phonetic Gen
Phonetic Gen2%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Free online phonetic generator

Product Hunt+1
Aspecto
Aspecto34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Next-gen distributed tracing platform

Indie Hackers
Neuro Image Gen
Neuro Image Gen22%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Give Wings to your Imaginations

Product Hunt+12