Sh

Shouldiuse.dev – Software dependency health checker

Hacker News

Shouldiuse.dev – Software dependency health checker

As software engineers we are often confronted with the decision of whether to code something ourselves or to add an existing library that does it for us. Whether we like it or not – we are adding dependencies sooner or later. And it's arguably good practice to check a new dependency beforehand: Is it maintained? By whom? How many issues does it have and how many of those are bugs? Are they being fixed? What's on the roadmap? What's the release frequency and how often do APIs break? One of our favorite solutions that already exist to answer such questions is the OpenSSF Scorecard project ( https://github.com/ossf/scorecard ) – we use this ourselves and can only recommend it. We built shouldiuse.dev around it to make results accessible as a website, and used the opportunity to dive deep into heavily LLM-assisted coding for the first time in a professional project. Three people (devs and non-devs) each started vibe-coding an initial prototypes, one using v0, one using lovable and one using Cursor. At first blown away by how fast we were able to generate these and how great there were looking, we soon ran into issues merging different ideas as there were multiple different web frameworks and versions flying around. The most work on the frontend definitely went into getting the details and small adaptions right. In parallel, on the backend we started to write a Go application that uses the ossf/scorecard library to do a lot of the checks we want. To also play around with AI on that end, we intentionally made heavy use of Copilot and tried around with different models and prompts. We also added more metrics to the dependency check that we gather via GitHub API, and finally generate textual summaries via OpenAI. The Prompt to generate a final textual recommendation consists of: * A header stating the role, capabilities and limitations, and the expected response format (JSON and no lists/bullet points) – We also tell it to be critical, objective and give short and concise answers. * The result of the scorecard check * Additional community-related data * The questions that are being shown in the FAQ section – The answers to those are also generated by the LLM. Since such a check involves heavy use of the GitHub API, we require users to input a GitHub personal access token when requesting a check. The first time a repository is checked on shouldiuse.dev it will take a few seconds, but then the results are stored in a postgres for faster retrieval later on. For now it only works for public GitHub repos, but we might add other platforms if there is interest. We also added a remote MCP server with built-in authentication, so you can directly access shouldiuse from your IDE and automatically check new dependencies anytime a coding assistant introduces one to ensure that only safe dependencies are added to the project. What started as a fun internal experiment quickly surprised us with how useful it turned out to be. We didn’t plan to release it publicly, but we think might be useful for other devs and therefore we wanted to share it here. Any feedback is welcome!

Share card

Actual performance

13points
16comments
Made the leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: cursor, model, mcp · Missing: mac, agents, macos
97%97% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: started, para · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
85%85% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: exist, existing, ide · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
59%59% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
AppSumoStrong fit for a featured deal · Strong signals: platform, soon, users · Missing: plus, intuitive, reviews
57%57% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: personal, answers, users · Missing: mobile apps, ios, entrepreneurs
48%48% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
14%14% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: introduce · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Te
Team Health Checker53%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Team Health Checker

Hacker News10
baileyburnsed.dev
baileyburnsed.dev33%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

I build software for $997/m

Indie Hackers
[H
[Haskell] Checker of XCompose for duplicates and overlaps68%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

[Haskell] Checker of XCompose for duplicates and overlaps

Hacker News1
I
I made a terrible spell checker in Go47%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

I made a terrible spell checker in Go

Hacker News2
No
Norvig Spell Checker44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Norvig Spell Checker

Hacker News3
DM
DMARC Checker44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

DMARC Checker

Hacker News70
In
Ingredient Allergen Checker46%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Ingredient Allergen Checker

Hacker News3
Symptom Checker
Symptom Checker12%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Decidual Cast Symptom Checker

Indie Hackers
AI
AI Dentist (Dental symptom checker)31%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AI Dentist (Dental symptom checker)

Hacker News1
AI
AI Hallucination Checker31%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AI Hallucination Checker

Hacker News3