AI Debate Arena – See Which LLM Argues Best
AI Debate Arena – See Which LLM Argues Best
Ever wish you could get the best arguments for both sides of a debate? I built an AI-powered debate platform that pits language models against each other on controversial topics. Each AI is randomly assigned a side (pro/con). You vote before and after to see if you were persuaded. Most content today presents lopsided arguments. They provide strong points for one side, weak ones for the other. This project aims to surface the strongest arguments from both sides, using LLMs to simulate a fair debate. With enough usage, I want to use it to benchmark LLMs. My hypothesis is that randomly assigning sides of the debate, models with built-in biases will score worse. It’s currently using GPT 4o, Grok 3, and Gemini 2.5 Flash. It’s early, still rough around the edges, and I’d love feedback on the concept and direction. Curious how the HN crowd thinks this could evolve. It’s built for the intellectually curious that are open minded about changing their positions. Some next steps I’m considering: - Tuning the length and structure of arguments - Prompting improvements to reduce rhetorical fluff - Optional audio output of debates Try it out and let me know what you think!
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Correct prediction on native model
Similar products
Retrieval-augmented LLM debate opponent on DebateSum dataset
Justbate – Quora for debate
Opscotch - Debate Anything
I debate myself over hypothetical situations
LLM Debate Benchmark
Peer Arena – LLMs debate and vote on who survives
DebateGate, a website for civil debate
debate smarter with AI
Fast header-only arena allocator
ConvoClash – LLMs debate each other