We

We are 2.4x faster than Open AI latest SST model

Hacker News

We are 2.4x faster than Open AI latest SST model

Speech-to-Text technology is crucial for audio processing applications, but most solutions are limited by speed, accuracy, or feature constraints. What if you could transcribe audio with higher accuracy, better features, and significantly faster performance? We benchmarked OpenAI's newest gpt-4o-transcribe model against JigsawStack STT across real-world scenarios, including performance, accuracy, feature set, and multilingual capabilities. Here's what we found: Performance: - JigsawStack processes audio ~2.4x faster than OpenAI's model across all audio lengths - This speed advantage remains consistent with both short clips and longer audio files File Support: - OpenAI limits files to 25MB and 25 minutes of audio per request - JigsawStack handles files up to 100MB and 4 hours of audio per request Advanced Features: - Speaker Recognition: JigsawStack accurately identifies up to 50 different speakers with timestamps - Detailed Timestamps: Provides sentence-level timing data by default - Translation: Built-in support for translating audio into 100+ languages Real-world Accuracy: - Achieved 100% accuracy on noisy audio samples where OpenAI scored 94% - Properly identified repeated phrases and sentence boundaries that OpenAI missed Our team has focused on building a specialized solution that outperforms in nearly every metric that matters for real-world applications. Check out the full breakdown here: http://jigsawstack.com/blog/openai-audio-stt-vs-jigsawstack-... Let us know what you think! We'd love feedback from the HN community - particularly from those working with audio transcription at scale.

Share card

Actual performance

4points
4comments
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: ios, including · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
94%94% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: model, new, openai · Missing: mac, agents, macos
87%87% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoStrong fit for a featured deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
55%55% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: ide, io, including · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
50%50% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: ios · Missing: mobile apps, personal, entrepreneurs
48%48% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
14%14% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: audio · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
1%1% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

2x
2x-4x faster strlen() in C66%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

2x-4x faster strlen() in C

Hacker News19
Sprich.ai
Sprich.ai51%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Erledige 4x so viel. Sprich einfach.

Product Hunt+3
BaseRT
BaseRT64%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

6.4x faster than llama.cpp, 3.9x faster than MLX

Product Hunt+223Open Source
4x
4x Your ML Model55%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

4x Your ML Model

Hacker News2
Spokenly
Spokenly58%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Type 4x faster with your voice

Product Hunt+179Productivity
La
Latest 2017 H1B Salaries Visualized33%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Latest 2017 H1B Salaries Visualized

Hacker News3
Ge
Get the Latest on Iran30%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Get the Latest on Iran

Hacker News1
Aw
Awsmux – Multi-account AWS CLI, up to 5.4x faster, 7.4x fewer tokens39%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Awsmux – Multi-account AWS CLI, up to 5.4x faster, 7.4x fewer tokens

Hacker News10
SaasHunt
SaasHunt63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

a platform that discovers and showcases the latest and most

Indie Hackers1$300/moai
Zasper
Zasper63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

4X Better IDE than Jupyterlab

Product Hunt+11