[O

[OSS] Taking a Systematic Approach to Improving LLM Accuracy

Hacker News

[OSS] Taking a Systematic Approach to Improving LLM Accuracy

Motivation ========== Let me know if this sounds familiar: We spent months setting up our LLM application backend and integrating it into our frontend, but it ended up not being accurate enough to be useful in production. We, engineers, tend to approach LLM development as an engineering problem, as we do with most traditional software applications. This means we focus on wiring up a bunch of components together such as the OpenAI API, Vector DB, backend, frontend, auth, security, scalability, etc., and expect the application will just work. However with LLM development, there’s a second piece of the puzzle that comes after the engineering — making the application accurate. This part is often glossed over and not explored until after initial development is complete. As a result, teams end up spending 3-6 months on LLM development, just to realize what they’ve built is not useful for production. This is typically when they begin trial and erroring through accuracy improvements, using “vibe-checks” with little success. ======== Solution ======== Accuracy is the most important part of LLM development -- without an accurate application, the product is useless. The best way to improve accuracy is to systematically run numerous experiments, empirically testing the impact of changes to your LLM stack on your output. For example, how does adding a new paragraph to my prompt affect the overall accuracy of my application? We are working on a Framework that takes an accuracy-first approach from the beginning of your LLM Development journey. We do this by structuring your LLM development for rapid experimentation, providing you with all the tools needed to manage and evaluate experiments at scale, and helping you deploy your application to production. ================ Getting Involved ================ - Contribute, Create Issues, Star it on GitHub - Share Your Thoughts

Share card

Actual performance

2points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Strong signals: para · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
83%83% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: new, openai, using · Missing: mac, agents, macos
83%83% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: lua, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
55%55% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: month, way, para · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
48%48% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
28%28% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
13%13% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Incorrect prediction on native model

Similar products

Ta
Taking an accuracy-first approach to LLM Development51%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Taking an accuracy-first approach to LLM Development

Hacker News4
Th
Thredded forums are minimalistic and OSS62%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Thredded forums are minimalistic and OSS

Hacker News5
Dy
Dynmgrm – Operate DynamoDB with GORM (Golang OSS)49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Dynmgrm – Operate DynamoDB with GORM (Golang OSS)

Hacker News1
We
We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

We Put Chromium on a Unikernel (OSS Apache 2.0)

Hacker News132
My
My First OSS as a Teen44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

My First OSS as a Teen

Hacker News4
Im
Improving NSNotificationCenter49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Improving NSNotificationCenter

Hacker News1
Im
Improving on Daniel Bernstein's Libsecded49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Improving on Daniel Bernstein's Libsecded

Hacker News1
Re
Recapp'd – Improving NBA boxscores28%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Recapp'd – Improving NBA boxscores

Hacker News1
Re
Recapp'd – Improving NBA boxscores28%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Recapp'd – Improving NBA boxscores

Hacker News3
Ag
Agent Smith Is OSS41%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Agent Smith Is OSS

Hacker News1