Fine-Tuning Index of Open-Source LLMs vs. OpenAI
Fine-Tuning Index of Open-Source LLMs vs. OpenAI
The research team at Predibase analyzed 700+ fine-tuning experiments using 13 of the most popular open-source models, GPT-3.5/4/4o, and 31 distinct datasets and tasks. We chose open-source models with a max of 7B parameters to ensure that any organization can train the models on low-end GPUs. For evaluation, we utilized task-specific metrics including accuracy, rouge, and HumanEval to assess performance. Key Takeaways - LoRA Fine-tuned models outperform GPT-4 on specialized tasks - LoRA Fine-tuned models are fast and cheap to train and serve, averaging less than $8 each - Specialized tasks are ideal for LoRA fine-tuning
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Incorrect prediction on native model
Similar products
Open Source Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Your Agents
Terracotta – Platform for fine-tuning and evaluating LLMs
Open-source fine-tuning in a Colab notebook
Haven (YC S23) – Quickly iterate when fine-tuning open-source LLMs
Fine tuning and RLHF mistralai 7B using DeepSpeed
Courtyard – Open-source macOS app for local MLX fine-tuning Text
ShadowPEFT – Centralized and Detachable Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
AI fine-tuning platform to create custom LLMs
LLM reinforcement fine-tuning platform to improve LLM output
Quaterion – x100 faster fine-tuning of similarity learning models