In

Infracost (YC W21): Be proactive with your cloud costs

Hacker News

Infracost (YC W21): Be proactive with your cloud costs

Hi, we are Ali, Hassan, and Alistair, co-founders of Infracost ( https://www.infracost.io/ ). Infracost helps engineers see the cost of each Terraform change before launching resources. When changes are made, it posts a comment with the cloud cost impact. For example, “you’ve added 2 instances and volumes, and change an instance type from medium to large, your bill will increase by 25% next month, from $1000 to $1250 per month”. We launched in February 2021 ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26064588 ), and Infracost is now being actively used by over 3,000 companies. However, there is a shift happening in the cloud cost management space. New teams, called FinOps teams (a combination of "Finance" and "DevOps"), are being formed within companies to manage cloud costs. One of the first tasks assigned to these teams is to determine "who is using what" - that is, which teams, business units, products, etc. are spending the most on cloud. To accomplish this, they use tags. Tags are labels that all cloud resources should have and are key-value pairs. For example, a server could be tagged with: product=HackerNews; environment=production; team=blueTeam. So if resources are not tagged properly, then you can’t tell who is using what. However, FinOps teams face challenges because their tools are reactive. These tools begin by analyzing cloud bills and providing visibility of tags from there. This means that they are looking at resources that are already running in production and costing money. A customer recently shared, “I want all resources to be properly tagged. But if they are not, I would rather a resource not be tagged at all than be tagged incorrectly.” My "aha" moment! FinOps teams can define a tagging policy that can be validated in CI/CD before resources are launched. This is important because if code is shipped with the wrong tags, FinOps teams will have to fight for sprint time to fix them. Even if you shut down an untagged resource directly in the cloud, the next time Terraform runs, the resource will launch again with no tag. You need to fix the issue at its root. I’d love your feedback on our solution to the tagging problem. You define your tag key-value policy in our SaaS product, and Infracost checks all Terraform resources per change. If anything fails the policy, it posts a comment with the details of which resources need tags, and what the allowed values are. Once fixed, it will let the code be shipped to production. Try it out by going to https://dashboard.infracost.io/ , setting up with the GitHub app or GitLab app, and defining your tagging policy. It will then scan your repository and inform you of any missing tags and their file and line number. You can use the free trial, but if you need more time, please message me and I’ll extend it for you. I would also love to hear how others ensure that the correct tag keys and values are applied to all resources, and whether this is done proactively or reactively. Additionally, I would be interested in hearing about any lessons learned in the process. Cheers

Share card

Actual performance

86points
37comments
Made the leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: new, tasks, using · Missing: mac, agents, macos
89%89% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
80%80% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: 000, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
62%62% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: month · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
47%47% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
24%24% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Strong signals: saas, active · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
19%19% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

In
Infracost (YC W21): Cloud Costs for Terraform in VSCode61%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Infracost (YC W21): Cloud Costs for Terraform in VSCode

Hacker News76
Al
Algolia (YC W14) Presents DocSearch74%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Algolia (YC W14) Presents DocSearch

Hacker News9
Wh
Why we killed imwith and launched GIFted (Guggy YC S17)73%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Why we killed imwith and launched GIFted (Guggy YC S17)

Hacker News2
Cr
Crowdfunding by BackerKit (YC W13)63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Crowdfunding by BackerKit (YC W13)

Hacker News2
Wh
Why YC when there's YZ?59%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Why YC when there's YZ?

Hacker News5
So
Somethingservice (YC W23)57%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Somethingservice (YC W23)

Hacker News2
YC
YC for YC Rejects78%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

YC for YC Rejects

Hacker News1
YC
YC Hack Winner – RepoWorld67%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

YC Hack Winner – RepoWorld

Hacker News1
Platus YC F24
Platus YC F2477%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Your AI Paralegal

Product Hunt+271Legal
Modus
Modus56%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

AI proactive listener

Indie Hackerscommitment-full-time