I

I built a Q&A layer for research papers on top of arXiv.org

Hacker News

I built a Q&A layer for research papers on top of arXiv.org

Hi there, my name's Rafael and I am launching gotit.pub today! At the same time I'm "scratching my own itch". Let me explain: Gotit.pub is an online platform where anyone can discuss research papers, as a layer directly on top of the paper itself. I built it because it needs to exist and because I couldn't find any other place on the web that's doing this. As part of my regular job I read plenty of research papers (Vision, Graphics, NeRFs, ML etc..) and often I find things that are still unclear to me after studying. I'm sure the authors or community could answer my questions easily but where to start? Open a ticket on Github? Write an email to the authors? Ask on SO? None of these are great because the context of the paper is lost and it's (ab)using the platforms for tasks they were not designed to do. Arxiv.org has done a fantastic job democratizing the distribution of research (and it's winning! [1]). However it's only one-directional. The discussion and feedback channels are scattered, informal and/or inaccessible to many. I built gotit.pub to fix that. Also, looking at HN, for many users the value lies in the attached discussion more than in the linked site itself. I believe that this model also applies to research articles and that in the future it will feel unnatural to read an interesting paper without having the community's comments as an attached layer. I should mention that I have no PhD or ever worked in a research lab. Maybe (likely?) there's already an obvious solution to the discussion/feedback problem that I am not seeing. In that case I'm still happy to have built it because I know it'll be useful for me, personally :) I hope though that many of you will find it useful too (let me have your feedback in the comments!). Cheers! PS: You can actually discuss any research paper, not just ones on arXiv.org! PPS: For those interested, the whole site is built with Svelte / SvelteKit and a lot of PDF.js hackery. More bells and whistles to come, it's just MVP stage at this point. The quirky name is from another unrelated side-project of mine (gotit.dev) which builds on top of git but so far hasn't seen the light of day. I couldn't think of a good name for this one so I just adopted the name. Still fits, I think! [1] https://arxiv.org/stats/monthly_submissions

Share card

Actual performance

3points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: model, user, email · Missing: mac, agents, macos
83%83% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
best fitHighest predicted score across all platforms for this description.
Hacker NewsStrong engagement from HN community · Strong signals: exist, ide, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
71%71% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
Indie HackersFits the IH revenue-focused audience · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
67%67% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Strong signals: platform, users · Missing: plus, intuitive, reviews
46%46% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Strong signals: personal, month, monthly · Missing: mobile apps, ios, entrepreneurs
37%37% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
13%13% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Missing: web3, chat, crypto
0%0% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Incorrect prediction on native model

Similar products

St
StackOverflow for Research Papers74%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

StackOverflow for Research Papers

Hacker News2
Ha
HackerNews but for research papers59%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

HackerNews but for research papers

Hacker News319
PaperGate
PaperGate51%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Find Research Papers

Indie Hackers1ai
Pe
Petridish.org, a kickstarter for scientific research39%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Petridish.org, a kickstarter for scientific research

Hacker News79
Co
Coredemia – share and discuss research papers62%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Coredemia – share and discuss research papers

Hacker News60
Bibby AI
Bibby AI70%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

The AI co-author for research papers

Product Hunt+165Productivity
Ar
ArTok is TikTok for research papers49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

ArTok is TikTok for research papers

Hacker News8
Th
The “tl;dr” of Recent Transformer Papers58%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

The “tl;dr” of Recent Transformer Papers

Hacker News5
Th
The Federalist Papers, typeset as the 1787 newspapers they ran in67%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

The Federalist Papers, typeset as the 1787 newspapers they ran in

Hacker News58
Ba
Back Me Up – Find papers that back your argument63%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Back Me Up – Find papers that back your argument

Hacker News2