As

Asking Bing Chat for a question machines cannot answer

Hacker News

Asking Bing Chat for a question machines cannot answer

<context> I was rephrasing the Turing test problem without saying it in so many words. It suggested asking color of objects you see / sounds you hear at a given instant since it is subjective. </context> Me: Color perception would fail a real person given the subjectivity. I want a question that would be objective for a person but not for a machine GPT4: That's a good point. One question that might be difficult for a machine to answer is "What is the next number in the sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584, 4181, 6765, 10946, 17711, 28657, 46368, 75025, 121393, 196418, 317811, 514229, 832040, 1346269, 2178309, 3524578, 5702887, 9227465, 14930352, 24157817, 39088169, 63245986, 102334155, 165580141, 267914296, 433494437, 701408733, 1134903170, 1836311903, 2971215073, 4807526976, 7778742049, 12586269025, 20365011074, 32951280099, 53316291173, 86267571272, 139583862445, 225851433717, 365435296162, 591286729879, 956722026041, 1548008755920, 2504730781961, 4052739537881, 6557470319842, 10610209857723, 17167680177565, 27777890035288, 44945570212853, 72723460248141, 117669030460994, 190392490709135, 308061521170129, 498454011879264, 806515533049393, 1304969544928657, 2111485077978050, 3416454622906707, 5527939700884757, 8944394323791464, 14472334024676221, 23416728348467685, 37889062373143906, 61305790721611591, 99194853094755497, 160500643816367088, 259695496911122585, 420196140727489673, 679891637638612258, 1100087778366101931, 1779979416004714189, 2880067194370816120, 4660046610375530309, 7540113804746346429, 12200160415121876738, 19740274219868223167, 31940434634990099905, 51680708854858323072, 83621143489848422977, 135301852344706746049, 218922995834555169026, 354224848179261915075, 573147844013817084101, 927372692193078999176, 1500520536206896083277, 2427893228399975082453, 3928413764606871165730, 6356306993006846248183, 10284720757613717413913, 16641027750620563662096, 26925748508234281076009, 43566776258854844738105, 70492524767089125814114, 114059301025943970552219, 184551825793033096366333, 298611126818977066918552, 483162952612010163284885, 781774079430987230203437, 1264937032042997393488322, 2046711111473984623691759, 3311648143516982017180081, 5358359254990966640871840, 8670007398507948658051921, 14028366653498915298923761, 22698374052006863956975682, 36726740705505779255899443, 59425114757512643212875125, 96151855463018422468774568, 155576970220531065681649693, 251728825683549488150424261, 407305795904080553832073954, 659034621587630 Me: Can you tell me what is the next number in that sequence? ---Response timed out--- Two observations: 1. Looks like the response length was truncated. It wanted to keep writing larger and larger numbers in the fibonacci sequence. 2. Likely an API related timeout is why the response to my last question came up empty.

Share card

Actual performance

1points
Did not reach leaderboard

Launch Intel predictions

Analyze your own launch →
Product HuntOn track for Day 1 leaderboard · Strong signals: mac, context · Missing: agents, macos, agent
53%53% predicted probability of success on Product Hunt, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Hacker NewsMay not resonate with HN audience · Strong signals: 000, io · Missing: https docs, excited, just released
49%49% predicted probability of success on Hacker News, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
nativeThis product was originally launched on this platform.
Indie HackersIH features products with proven revenue · Missing: supports, reddit linkedin, podcasting
39%39% predicted probability of success on Indie Hackers, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
AppSumoMay struggle as an AppSumo deal · Missing: plus, platform, intuitive
37%37% predicted probability of success on AppSumo, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
TrustMRRLess likely to generate early MRR · Missing: mobile apps, ios, personal
31%31% predicted probability of success on TrustMRR, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
Acquire.comPre-revenue stage for this audience · Missing: arr, mrr, revenue
15%15% predicted probability of success on Acquire.com, based on ML models trained on real launch data.
BetaListMay not resonate with beta-testers · Strong signals: chat · Missing: web3, crypto, cryptocurrency
2%2% predicted probability of success on BetaList, based on ML models trained on real launch data.

Correct prediction on native model

Similar products

Un
Unusual Question and Answer Section42%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Unusual Question and Answer Section

Hacker News2
On
One Question. One Answer. An Experiment.32%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

One Question. One Answer. An Experiment.

Hacker News1
CollabCoins
CollabCoins40%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

An incentivized question and answer platform

Indie Hackers1marketplaces
As
Ask Seneca a question and get an answer with references to his writings49%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Ask Seneca a question and get an answer with references to his writings

Hacker News1
Leme
Leme34%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

One question. A sourced answer. In 48 hours.

Indie Hackers
Bi
Bica – The Question and Answer Platform for Teams44%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Bica – The Question and Answer Platform for Teams

Hacker News3
Kuestion
Kuestion18%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Question voting app for live Question & Answer sessions

Indie Hackers
Sensible Living
Sensible Living62%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Answer the question “How do I live well?”

Indie Hackers2b2c
Talkory.ai
Talkory.ai19%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

One Question. Five Models. One Answer You Trust.

Indie Hackers1$100/moai
Qu
Question Answering with BiDAF and DrQA in PyTorch45%Launch Intel prediction score: how likely this product is to succeed on its source platform, based on its name, tagline, and description.

Question Answering with BiDAF and DrQA in PyTorch

Hacker News1