Large Numbers Hypothesis Revisited
Large Numbers Hypothesis Revisited
I was reviewing Dirac's Large Numbers Hypothesis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_large_numbers_hypothesis) and decided to give it a second go, now with measurements of fundamental constants more precise than 100 years ago. And I stumbled upon a value for Hubble's constant that's uncannily close. Here are the full calculations. https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1K1qoUFvqZp1fWbpcKJWq63nflgwS0ZHh?usp=sharing Meaningless, or meaningful coincidence?
Share cardActual performance
Launch Intel predictions
Analyze your own launch →Correct prediction on native model
Similar products
Memorize large numbers with ease.
Implementing a trackball with rational numbers
Rational numbers for Java, why not?
Primeval Numbers
2048 without numbers
Sustinion - the large opinion collider (in spe)
Manages the results of large and small numbers of students
Transcendental numbers for arbitrary-length One-Time Pads
Prime numbers generator
Get nice, large favicons by API